Biological Nitrogen Removal Database

A manually curated data resource for microbial nitrogen removal


DNRA


Experimental setup


Influent:Synthetic wastewater

DNRA system:Continuous stirred-tank reactor

reactor:Chemostat culture: Double-jacket glass bioreactor 

Medium:Suspended sludge growth

Culture taken from:Activated sludge

Microorganism cultured:Denitrifying and DNRA bacteria

Respiration:Anaerobic

Electron donor:Acetate 

Electron acceptor:Nitrate

PH:7

Temperature:20°C

HRT:nan

NO3–N Influent conc(mg/L):23.5 mmol

NH4–N accumulation (mg/L/d):10

NO2–N removal rate (mg/L/d):3.7

NH4–N Accumulation rate (mg N/L/d):0.926


Experimental Information


NH4–N Effluent (mg N/L):

NO2–N Effluent (mg N/L):

NO3-N Effluent (mg N/L):

NH4–N removal rate mg/L/d:

NO2–N removal rate mg/L/d:3.7

NO3-N removal rate mg/L/d:

TN Removal rate (mg N/L/d):


Information about Article


Authors:van den Berg et al., 2016

Title:DNRA and Denitrification Coexist over a Broad Range of Acetate/N-NO3? Ratios, in a Chemostat Enrichment Culture

Pubmed link:Link

Full research link:Link

Abstract:Denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) compete for nitrate in natural and engineered environments. A known important factor in this microbial competition is the ratio of available electron donor and elector acceptor, here expressed as Ac/N ratio (acetate/nitrate-nitrogen). We studied the impact of the Ac/N ratio on the nitrate reduction pathways in chemostat enrichment cultures, grown on acetate mineral medium. Stepwise, conditions were changed from nitrate limitation to nitrate excess in the system by applying a variable Ac/N ratio in the feed. We observed a clear correlation between Ac/N ratio and DNRA activity and the DNRA population in our reactor. The DNRA bacteria dominated under nitrate limiting conditions in the reactor and were outcompeted by denitrifiers under limitation of acetate. Interestingly, in a broad range of Ac/N ratios a dual limitation of acetate and nitrate occurred with co-occurrence of DNRA bacteria and denitrifiers. To explain these observations, the system was described using a kinetic model. The model illustrates that the Ac/N effect and concomitant broad dual limitation range related to the difference in stoichiometry between both processes, as well as the differences in electron donor and acceptor affinities. Population analysis showed that the presumed DRNA-performing bacteria were the same under nitrate limitation and under dual limiting conditions, whereas the presumed denitrifying population changed under single and dual limitation conditions.